“Let’s get away from mediocrity’s drivel”©

Leave a comment

There are very serious issues on hand for us all

so we need to wade past: what someone ate,

the shoes we want or,”I like pastels better tan 

or gray,” to issues of worthworth time to debate,

we have lost sight of the horizon of quality

roadworthy, something fitting to the time we live,

if there is such a thing as truly being entitled

then reach out for something of substance to give,

we have been subjected to the: moronic, immoral,

platonic platitudes of complacencyso lukewarm,

where we would say we are against violence but

say nothing is wrong against someone to harm

when we dont like them ourselves, to say nothing

is (essentially) to: condone/agree with the behavior,

and yet in a failure to be truthful, to not desire to hurt 

someones feelings, wed forfeit truth for its inferior.

This should be our ‘National bird,’ comfortable and complacent.

We need to get away from: the thin skinned reactions, perceptions used in a less than circumspect manner (to hunt elephants with a telescope… and from the wrong end), knee jerk reactions (jumping to conclusions without the benefit of reason) and knowing something different than the next vs. not caring what someone else thinks (confidence vs. arrogance). We don’t need to sit back and allow something wrong to continue but we need to: stand up, speak out and let the cards fall where they may. Of course, this does need to be done from the perspective of love to be understood, even with the risk it will not be received with the same effort felt from when it is reacted to. Reaction coming from a biased opinion can add further confusion to: what was expressed, the intention strived for and the motive or purpose to the action taken.

“Disarm or to dominant and conquer?”©

1 Comment

Do you still say you believe in fate…

not just love, not just hate?

Not simply another bombing we’re arming

if we’d destroy just to proliferate!

So how is that working out with peace…

none is seen, a trigger’s release!

Can we not see this killing as wrong?

Learning peace will see hate to cease!

You point at the soldier causing you pain

but you do the same thing, moisture by rain,

and yet we all get wetter by the day… on

into the night… calm gone and you’re fain

with the delivery of hurt… of harm,

there is no snake there to sooth or charm

by actions repeated and steady for blood…

for vengeance, to dominant or disarm.

Then we have politics and duplicity too…

to walk the tight rope, the media view,

to show us the smiley face and openly lie…

to say she’ll represent the many not true,

and we need to then look at her support…

those easily deceived, her life to abort

and yet these damn parlor games are the

rage, to run from the truth of her consort,

and the bomb blew off in the hand as held…

the sneaky soon caught, tree fallen as felled

and the cedars of Lebanon now just a myth,

like the unity of Hillary… same Tirado of old.

There comes the likelihood… Hillary’s campaign might blow up- right in front of us all. Is there no ‘illusion’ big enough to cover what the American people might see? See an article on Hillary from an interview, with the Des Moines Register, Aug. 8th, 2015, and see if it spells,”D-I-S-A-R-M,” to you? What is disarming is to find out the image used on this piece [originally placed at LinkedIn… and stating,”I will get the NRA shut down for good if I become president. If we can ban handguns we will do it.”] is ‘a fabrication [not true]’ but the story with the link (in the body of the poem) is true. Since Hillary supports the UN… it is hard to say,”What is truth?” An abstract from it is found below… which has already been cleansed.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apparently is supporting the UN resolution 16/18 introduced by OIC and plans to hold meetings on how it can be implemented:

JEDDAH, Ramadan 1/Aug 1 (IINA)- During the next few months, Washington plans to host a coordination meeting to discuss with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) how to implement resolution no. 16/18 on combating defamation of religions, and how to prevent stereotypes depicting religions and their followers; as well as disseminating religious tolerance, which has been endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council last March, in agreement with Western countries. The resolution was adopted after lengthy discussions held between the OIC and countries in which the phenomenon of Islamophobia is in the rise.”

P.S. I’ve really run into many obstacles as I’ve tried to up-grade this article and expand the depth of its meaning and integrity. It is possible to see more at the other posting. [This is the other posting].

P.S.S. One (very) interesting fact here is the UN resolution was aimed against Christians… and spoke about ‘image’ being more important than the substantive evidence [for Christians it is historical and not mythological] for one’s faith. I fail to see when ‘perception’ of a faith (any faith) is to be more highly prized than the demonstrative actions of people within a faith- as this seems what Jesus [Himself] was against. Are we then to be more concerned with the image of a religion than the tenets and faith of a religion… one that would sooner exterminate [commit genocide] any of another faith for disagreeing?

Unlike: deceit, deception, hate or dishonorable!

“God’s will or man’s desire?”©

Leave a comment

Is it due to Obama support you might vote for her?

“When you whisper against the mountain and hear the echo… realize this is not the fate of man but the providence of God, for the fulness of this realization (of life itself) comes not by allowing injustice to prevail but to take the high ground and: speaking the truth, standing against it and maintaining the courage to see it through to fruition.”

When was destiny ever advanced by

ill-conceived motives… throughout time

it has been prevailing, cultures and man’s

history is clearly proof, legal or by crime?

From Stalin to Marx, Clinton to Bush, there

has been ‘political correctness’ or the gulag…

the ‘free speech zones’ or the ‘Blackwater

prisons,’ and torture used by a scalawag,

what we find a shade apart from red to ‘Red’

or from ‘the chalk on the cleats‘ of despots,

there has never been a time more crucial

than today… moral decay shows us it rots.

When there are more questions than answers to be seen, for one candidate… Hillary, for: mishandling classified information (the email-gate), the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens (one of our own left behind), the open and overt lies (proven by her denial), support for Planned Parenthood (no consideration for human life), connections with the CFR (Council for Foreign Relations) and the UN (United Nations) and now… high finance and ‘white slavery’ and gun running concerns coupled with UN long range plans (goals) for the US. So, with the growing list of people discounted: Veterans, child bearing Women, freedom loving Americans, truth seekers, anyone that values ‘free choice’ and Christians… as well as open support for her by President Obama,”Do you still want Hillary as much as you thought you did?”

A recent statement by President Obama, see below, made with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg

“Multilateralism regulates [American] hubris.”

Is this a vaulted UN perspective?

Here are a couple more articles by The Atlantic on ‘hubris’ and the President explained, at this link or this one– your choice respectively. I’ll offer you one of my own to be seen at this link here.

It is a [very] fine line between what some might call ‘slander’ vs. ‘blasphemy’ and you do not see death come by slander. The image here (at LinkedIn) comes with this quote,

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Barack Hussein Obama

Image from here

[Please Note: The quote on the image used (at LinkedIn) for this article is accurate, and you can see it in the transcript provided by the White House,”Remarks by the President to the UN General Assembly,” made Sept. 29th, 2012. To be fair… the statement was embellished upon but taken out of context and left to stand on its own is where the questions very surely arise. In context, this sentence doesn’t fit with the rest of the information provided, and it would appear as if it was a thought to be (intentionally) separate and apart [distinctly different] from the body of the paragraph. It is due to things like this I find it hard to believe President Obama is as he makes claim to be, in this speech, that he is Christian! As to the quote itself… even snopes is in on this one, see it here.]

“No lucid paltry thoughts for me… Passover comes”©

Leave a comment

If mankind would assail philosophy, philosophies of the mind,

with as much alacrity as has been shown throughout this cycle

of the US election process (without a valance), measures to gain

geo-political guidelines [New World Order], a change so fickle,

and even the common man and woman to think it ineffectual…

it would not resemble ‘The descent of man,’ by Charles Darwin,

the title is deceptive to topic and the influence of man without

recognizing God as ‘Being God’ is due to the influence of sin,

from back in the ‘Edwardian and Victorian Eras’ come expanded

thoughts embellished beyond to include a term,”The Noble Lie,”

started with Plato to include the likes of: Gustave Le Bon, Immanuel

Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Georg Hegel, Leo Strauss… on we try

as to have undue influence and impact on how we (today) see

societies, culture and ways to manipulate a country’s politics,

to use those involved as if they were the very stepping stones to

be used and ‘walked on’… they see themselves as keys, not locks,

and the masses to be just tools… the tools to gain their own goal

of ambition… and control… and power from this modest subterfuge,

as an end to a means (thesis, antithesis, synthesis) and not to be

looked at or recognized before eyes of humanity see the pilferage

to be the detractor and sad loss of years spent to gain nothing but

false promises from ‘The Noble Lie’ and those brash enough to take…

and humanity faced the ‘Age of Enlightenment,’ the Renaissance of

the philosophies of man distilled down to the unholy punch we drank,

philosophers strived to engage ‘Reason,’ kings and church denied,

as their promises told us by their smiling faces, unhinged from God,

but time hinges on one event in human history… hinges on ‘The Cross

and divides history… no noumenon here, look above or face the sod.

Humanity and the ages of man have given us great minds [one being Leo Strauss] but they’d leave out or disregard the very ‘Being of God Himself.’ To not understand Jesus as doing the will of ‘The Father’ for the benefit of human kind… the sacrifice made through His blood (as the substituted Paschal lamb) at the cross– done willingly and obediently to fulfill scripture. This meant God would die for us to spare us from an eternity (completely conscious and aware) away from Him.

[Below is found at this link]

Revelation combines the Old Testament picture of the wicked drinking the cup of God’s wrath (e.g., Psalm 75:7-8; Jer 25:15-29) with hell-fire to depict the perpetual, conscious torment of the wicked (Rev 14:10-11).

Mark Lilla summarizes Strauss this way…

Philosophy must always be aware of the dangers of tyranny, as a threat to both political decency and the philosophical life. It must understand enough about politics to defend its own autonomy, without falling into the error of thinking that philosophy can shape the political world according to its own lights.

… and yet,

A quote by Leo Strauss… on Machiavelli, below, and a thought. Leo Strauss (1958) whose view of Machiavelli is quite different in many ways, agreed about Machiavelli’s influence on republicanism [with J.G.A. Popcock (1975)] and argued that even though Machiavelli was a teacher of evil he had a nobility of spirit that led him to advocate ignoble actions. Does this not seem like a contradiction in terms, evil and nobility?

Machiavelli is the only political thinker whose name has come into common use for designating a kind of politics, which exists and will continue to exist independently of his influence, a politics guided exclusively by considerations of expediency, which uses all means, fair or foul, iron or poison, for achieving its ends—its end being the aggrandizement of one’s country or fatherland—but also using the fatherland in the service of the self-aggrandizement of the politician or statesman or one’s party.

Along with the list of philosophers (above) one should also look at the other people he read (as it is true Strauss did) and often wrote about it. Find Strauss’s writing here, from Chicago’s own… The Leo Strauss Center, The University Of Chicago.

Then came Hegelian Dialectics (used by the Neo-cons), a method to turn a society into the very opposite of what it once started as- (thesis, antithesis, synthesis… or Problem, Reaction, Solution).

“… Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

Hermann Goering

Free ebooks by ‘Project Gutenburg,’ for:

Gustave Le Bon; The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind which was read by Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

Immanuel Kant: The Critique of Pure Reason

Charles Darwin: The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex and On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection

Friedrich Nietzsche: The Antichrist or ‘Anti-Christian’ by his own meaning also

Georg Hegel: Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind

Ecclesiastes 12:12-13 And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh. 13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

Nihilism: the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless. Little wonder suicides are increasing!

As to ‘Humanism‘… oddly, this is the same beliefCharles Manson had.

John Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual “could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions”.

1 Corinthians 1:18 KJV


18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

them that perish–rather, “them that are perishing,” namely, by preferring human “wisdom of words” to the doctrine of the “cross of Christ.” It is not the final state that is referred to; but, “them that are in the way of perishing.” So also in 2 Corinthians 2:152 Corinthians 2:16.

Who’s truth do you hold in your hands?

How about freeaccess to an online Bible (many variations to choose from)found here. Happy Passover 2016! Yep, this comes just from another brainless christian… as the world would view christians themselves- all from a leap of blind faith. I find it much easier to believe in Jesus… for there seems to be more effort needed to deny Him as ‘Being God Himself.’

“Dog-eat-dog and welcome to Chicago’s finest”©

Leave a comment

Dear Brother Ja’Mal Green, who do you support for President

and if you say you’d raise up Hillary… read this if you please?

By placing yourselves in the middle of a ‘Trump rally’ and hoping

to exercise freedom of speech is to run with bulls you’d tease

but such an action flies in the right to lawfully assembly… especially

at such an event when the demon you chase came from Chicago,

the fine art of dog-eat-dog comes from Leo Straussian teaching,

and it is a philosophy made manifest best exampled a quango…

the body appointed under Bush Jr. (the Neo-cons) came from

the works of: Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and others of this same ilk,

in,”Thoughts on Machiavelli,” Strauss emphasizes wickedness

as wholesome… ‘free speech zone’ segregated, not even with silk,

and the policies carried forward by President Obama, unchanged,

are of and from this same playbook, Hillary too a CFR devotee…

so Brother Ja’mal Green, there is more here than meets the eye,

and the eye fails our sight if it attempts to disregard you or me.

If we offer nothing but opposition to what is being promoted, at a ‘Trump Rally,’ and deceive ourselves to claim it was done peacefully… for you know and I know this is not the common goal for us promoted in love. Please read ‘Philosophy’ from this page on Strauss and tell me He cared for uniting Americans… or anyone else for that matter. With his teaching rooted in: Nietzche, Hegel and devoted to the principles of nihilism with a metaphysical twist. I don’t think MLK, Jr. would have chosen this to protest against… peacefully or not! Doctor King supported inclusion vs. exclusion, peace over tyranny… love over hate.

Students of his (Strauss) are on the world stage, in the US found on both sides of the aisle, and it is up to us to be aware what they truly represent… over being inclusive of our county as a whole. #2Ja’MalGreen

“The new face of hate… the same as the old face of hate”©

1 Comment

Right before ‘Passover 2016‘ we see discrimination

and inequality, if allowed to continue as it has been…

and we (the rest of the whole world here) had better

sit up… stand up and pay attention or it is an omen,

for the last seven and a half years we, as a country,

have given more respect to those we fight than allies…

Israel has been an ally for many years, and we just

lost a 28-year-old US Army Vet in Tel Aviv, to realize

martyrdom wears a different face than it used to wear…

now a face with a political agenda and a religious bias,

and if ‘Peace‘ is the ultimate goal we can learn or even

to know as coming from religion itself… seems so pious.

When definitions change, in front of our eyes, is when there is something afoot (in preparation or progress [even thought of as progress or progressive, asserted effort]; happening or beginning to happen. Take the very word ‘martyr’ and see what I mean…

can you say ‘Hubris,’ I know you can!?! Originally, the word implied one was killed for what they believed but the meaning of the word has been highjacked [bastardized/corrupted] to include someone willing to die… and kill as many (innocent victims) as they possibly can.

martyr: a person who is killed because of their religious beliefs.

In Wikipedia, the online Encyclopedia, Martyr is now defined (1) by what it meant (originally) and (2) by what it also implies today.

[Please note the very first sentence and the third one… as these describe (1) and (2) above respectively, and the latter bears with it a dire consequence to our days ahead. Also look at the meaning of the word listed below the opening statements.]

I’m including three (very) different views by different media sources below to the attack in Tel Aviv, happening on Tuesday, March 8th, 2016, and how one calls the soldier killed 28 and another 29-years-old. I think the last article expresses more of a view we should have been seeing all along [for the last 7.5 years] with a Nation we have called ‘our friend and an ally.’ Does multilateralism regulate [American] hubris, as President Obama told The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg or has he simply given America over to policies of the UN for the UN? No different than Clinton has in mind to do, I expect!

New York Post

CNSNews.com a division of the Media Research Center

The Times Of Israel on line

“To stand or fall”©

1 Comment

Once upon a time…

there was hate, and it thrived,

there was good times and bad…

as we lived, breathed and survived,

granted… surviving is not living

(to the fullest) but living is not dying,

and in order to live we must be born…

each life important, love learned in being,

and there is more to be said for this

chance we all have been God given…

here we must come to life and grow,

meaning in spirit to ripen and deepen,

can we then come to understand what

to stand or fall” means, as by an apter,

Langston Hughes lived in Harlem in the

1920’s… memory to a happily ever after.

[Now that it is after ‘Super Tuesday,’ let’s do some careful analyzing of: truth, mythos and lies… being told the black community (and the rest of us) in America- using news of the day, historical facts and the many varied bias’s being past around for truth.]

There is more being told us, in the media today, about ‘the Klan‘ links of the past… directed against Trump. The same might be said of Hillary too (if Planned Parenthood was openly discussed at length)in her open and professed support for this organization. I give you a quote by Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood… in the US, and you can see it below [Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p.80 & 1922].

“Birth Control which has been criticized as negative and destructive, is really the greatest and most truly eugenic method, and its adoption as part of the program of Eugenics will immediately give a concrete and realistic power to that science. In fact, birth control has already been accepted by the most lucid and clear-sighted among eugenicists themselves, as the most constructive and necessary of the means to racial health.”

Still think Hillary can be trusted, if she has not spoken up well enough to be (transparent) truthful about her email, then was she told to take the blame… or is she covering up for the President himself?

As to President Obama and his connection to ‘Planned Parenthood,’ from this same lens I give you a very detailed site on his Science Czar, John Holdren. Here is one of his quotes, look below…

“Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not; … “

I gift the black community (and us all) with two links, one from ‘Black Genocide‘ and the other by ‘Priests For Life: African-American Outreach.’

I’m also listing some works by Langston Hughes, through the Poetry Foundation, seen at the link here.

Here are a couple of my other writings: on close to this, on this or views that might influence American voters. #emailacigar

1… what phylum species or kingdom is a human being if not human itself

2… the point of pointlessness

3… hillary in the news

4… once upon a time

5… lift every voice (y’all) and sing

Older Entries