Why does “Google” give us the wrong information here?

1 Comment

Everyone knows “Daylight Savings Time” was brought to America by Ben Franklin, after a trip to France, right? Then it was implemented in the US, during the winter, when there was less light during the daytime- thusly called by maximizing (for economic gains) daytime use of day light. The hour of our day would fall-back near the start of winter (BEGIN) and spring-forward (END) before the spring equinox. So why is “Google” telling us this is not accurate? Everyone knows the internet is always right, right?


Is this prima facia evidence why so many people believe as they do… being told one thing (on-line) but it is found out to be entirely untrue?












Little wonder, in this day and time, with the younger generation being taught less in schools on truth in academia… still we see other instances of the inaccurate information being foisted on the general public. When articles are written by journalists, like Joe Dziemianowicz, of the New York Daily News, like this one… all we get is an article summing up what is antithetical to the truth about “the what and the how” of DST, and not the broader picture. Even on a historic web site (speaking of World War 1 and Ben Franklin) dedicated to “when” DST began in the US, it ends with the same wrong conclusion; which is,”Daylight Savings Time ends in November”. Since the change of our time (normal time) begins in November, altered to give… seemingly… more light during the day, and then goes back to normal hours in spring- doesn’t it begin in November and end in March? Since I live in Arizona but work in Nevada, during times of DST in use (and Arizona doesn’t change… stays on normal time), this is only a concern to me to get to work leaving an hour later during “the winter” but “regular” times (an hour before I need to be there) the rest of the year!


Ben would be rolling in his grave from such a viewpoint being taken for truth!













Memo deflection does not lead us to transparency denied us… does it?


The Steele dossier, paid for by Hillary and the DNC (don’t forget this for this is defined as conspiracy), was used to: tarnish an opponent in a Presidential race, obtain a legal wiretap illegally, and was known by agents, who signed on to approve the wiretap, as being a fraud to begin with. The patsy (stooge) used was John McCain, being told about the dossier and the Russian connection, and later brought in to be given the hand-off of the material- to believe he was then providing something unknown to be exposed (wink-wink).








Here comes to Pooh-poohing of it all in the statements that try to: deflect the truth (of the corruption), claim the Dems didn’t get their side of it on the table, and this is politicizing the whole thing by one side. Such crap… and truly “Deplorable” in scope, attempt to pander more of what they got caught with without blame, and to turn a “blind eye” to the truth. The truth is the political landscape was weaponized… vulgar activity was caught, and one half of the country is in denial to: the efforts… effects or is so complacent they’d rather persist in taking the wrong side of disassociation over the right side of open declarations of true transparency in American politics. Now “deep state” is a commonly used term, to those libertines (any seeking gains for themselves first) and political toadies, and we can thank the Obama Administration and those (directly) exposed to act on behalf of one parties politics to the detriment of us all. Now “Selective Disclosure” is the obtuse way around to arrive at the solution for sheer mediocrity.










The kiss of betrayal here, isn’t it?

We’re (NOT) doing science… it’s research on YOU!

1 Comment

There would not be any blame if you would seek out the truth over conjecture/imagination at warp speed… or hate driven bias before actions of a beneficial nature.


Now with a ’shut-down’ NREPP (National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices), we can alter not only the title of the work being done, under the banner of behavioral health therapies, and address primary issues as they should have been in the first place. This comes at a time the CDC came out to clarify its own position on these matters in December, 2017.

[The brief abstract below is of two bits of info from this article.]

Warren Throckmorton, a psychology professor of Grove City College in Pennsylvania, said his interest in the field grew from his realization that “change therapy” — to alter people’s sexual orientation — has no scientific basis.

If ‘change therapy’ has no scientific basis to it and is not ‘evidence-based’ as would be claimed, wouldn’t that amount to ‘quackery’ being offered up as science? It would be wrong to suggest it being nothing more than a socialized experiment in subjective conditioning, even if there was a defined purpose to implementing such a radical change to what a person started as- male or female.

I look at this as more of ’the politically correct’ mindset, nothing but a means to secure conditioned thought patterns… to reach for a conditioned people doing what is expected of them- a Stepford public willing to do what is asked of them without consideration to the consequences. See the definition below… from the link above.

“Political Correctness”

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority,  and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of turd by the clean end.”

The far left, not to be ‘left’ out, had on the Governor’s desk in California a Bill, one that did cause a stirring of the teapot- SB 219. What was said about it before it was enacted and what the actual Bill contains are found at their respective links.

Let’s take this in a different direction… to call the media on the carpet for using the same practices on us- and look at how narrow or how broad the bandwidth is being adjusted… for political purposes! On the Rachel Maddow Show, through MSNBC, is this very narrow view, almost myopic, and speaking of opacity. Rachel scans through to narrowly point out, as if we need to be directed to… lead by the nose, GPS guidelines for why someone would use their service. The other side of the spectrum is from FOX, pointing out who paid for it (Hillary and the DNC), with an article by Bret Baier and one from Hannity. If opacity was the goal… I’d say the bigger snow job comes from: Rachel, the DNC and Hillary… aided by GPS (not to mention the DOJ, FBI… and McCain just to play the stooge) to muckrake the field ‘press’ will be allowed to cover! Let’s end the experimentation on the public at large and get back to less advocacy journalism but news that is researched first and is accurate. It seems the media is running a temperature, and can’t remember it’s purpose (being politicized) and has a short memory to reality over being enamored with dystopian bias.





December 21st, 2017… and hardly found news worthy through the media- except here (see below)! As a result of illegal drugs sold in Chicago alone… we can expect more of the current problems found there!









Can parallels converge?

Leave a comment

As with Iraq, where the power vacuum was left void… after removing Saddam (making room for ISIS [thanks to Bush]), the divide provided us in the US under Obama has a very real and inconvenient truth to see (this time on race and tolerance… with favoritism practiced and condoned). The parallels, when looked at, are as striking as they are disturbing.


As if another more prominent scene (today) could be provided,”Oh look… another protest.” This time a protest about the outcome, the verdict, of the Kate Steinle murder trial- in front of the White House. What makes this ‘inconvenient’ is the protest itself. Let’s take a closer look at it, shall we?


It would seem reasonable, for all practical purposes, to think the alt-right more extreme than some might like. If this is the ‘Yin’ then the ‘Yang’ becomes ‘Antifa’ by proxy… now becoming ’the alt-left’ in the absence of description to actions condoned by the left and supported by a well known financial backer, i.e., George Soros. At this protest: the incorrectness of the verdict, a stronger look at building the wall (Southern Border fence), justice denied the victim. The other side, Antifa, is protesting: against racial profiling and against the extremism it sees?



When the incident of question, the death of Kate Steinle, happened in a sanctuary city… one given rise to by leftwing ideology, is to hear Antifa say: race over death, protection over liberty and support to any not our own. This is not a racial thing, primarily, it is an immigration thing… in a city (granting) willing to place it’s own (possibly) in harm’s way. If it isn’t about race then who benefits from it being called that… if support is paid to Antifa for showing up- none other than George Soros himself. George has also supports BLM (Black Lives Matter) and Antifa, together, and does anyone vaguely remember Hillary’s slogan? Is this what was meant or implied?



The agreement recently made with the NFL and George Soros makes it a mockery of race itself, having been used by ‘the Man’ to accomplish an end to a means- with no regard for: country, race (nationality) or human rights! As for me… I have no involvement here if I do not watch another game, and I’ve never been concerned over race so much as to ever get informed or involved myself.


Who used who… and then used us?



Think this through… pro-American or pro-terrorist?


As if you thought Ted Cruz wrong for ‘willfully denying citizenship’, now look at it with ‘eyes wide open here’.


This has led to what Ted Cruz has begun (and I would agree), if you [PROVABLY] become associated with a: known terrorist, terrorist group (an enemy of the USA and would seek to cause harm or injury to her citizens [or worse]… even if you are a citizen already) you deserve nothing more than to be stripped of your citizenship and sent packing!




NOTE: What Hillary did was not as Ted Cruz relates,”… when she was in the Senate, supported very similar legislation,” but she did aid a faceless and unknown enemy hiding behind an International cause- see below…  





then this.




I wonder what John Kerry would say… or Hillary… or Obama?


In the US even Christians must follow the rules of the road… the law, and not seek to harm others- if they hold true to the teaching of Jesus Christ.


When does it become vinegar… the wine we’d drink (or is it punch)?

1 Comment


The Democratic Party, and I belong there too, has a lot to answer for: to themselves, of their own actions (look at all the planned protests… still) and those of a corruptible nature through the DNC itself, and backers of the political drumbeats they would follow- so blindly… like backer George Soros (and his support of antifa… just look at what is being done in Europe by these thugs).


Check on a few of these links and see if there is or is not some credibility… and questionable validity to what it really means to be a ‘progressive’ in the political climate we live in today! https://pastebin.com/Z4TXhyQS





As to the left (those who swallowed the pill) pointing to ‘fascism’… and then cowering behind tactics that look like brown-shirts, really! Soros is tilting the world stage and still seeks to impact the whole affair with more chaos than we have already seen. Do you really support this or him? http://barenakedislam.com/2017/08/24/antifa-thugs-chant-george-soros-where-is-our-money/ https://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/europe-on-the-verge-of-collapse-soros.html



Can we not see the futility of pointing at one (as if to point to anyone one might be in opposition to as being a fascist/bigot/sexist/pick-your-choice) and then to do worse than they have done to you (in actuality)… the tree of liberty made fruitless by these actions. Still think antifa is the way to go… then you’d have a long way to go to understand the difference between dying for a cause and killing for a cause- two distinctly different natures but currently portrayed as being one and the same… thanks to ‘political correctness’ and the cadre of insipidly mordant followers.



So when it comes to George Soros and the Democratic Party… it is not just a casual connection but an outright war against what it means to be ‘American’ and America itself! To deny this is to stick your head in the sand of indifference and decide the ‘hatred of the past’ is better for us in our future.


One video I’d like to share with you is to see and understand another parallel exists, stemming from Russia, and it is the other extremist (compare the two) to see also. See below…



Then one last tidbit to chew on… see below. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/08/26/germany-shuts-down-antifa-related-website-responsible-for-g-20-summit-violence


No more ‘slick-willy’ and her (Mrs. Bill/Hillary) 52 card pick-up

1 Comment


[This is shared for people like Wendy Bugliari, and those short-sighted to want one thing over another (still) and not see we often get what we need. Here is to being positive about what happened over desiring to see it as they’d so choose it to be. Let the house-of-cards fall (finally) and be done with it. Move on and get over it… lead, follow or get out of the way!]



Now that we know what Trump was asking here… and the ‘who exactly’ is known… along with the litany of other dirty tricks- Rodney King said it best,”Why can’t we all just get along?”



Is this truly what one has called,”Christmas in October“… for Trump, and (it’s about time) vindication of a very ambitious smear tactic by Hillary and the DNC? I’d say so… if there is going to be ‘a game of 52 card pick-up, let it be with Hillary behind bars for willfully and knowingly violating ‘reported expenditures’ during the campaign. If she can ‘slick-willy’ her way out of: doing what she did during the campaign (actions and speech), gloss over the truth and even try to change our impression of Benghazi (her facts and what AfriCOM saw with a drone don’t jive… no protestors were present before the attack [top military officials in Stuttgart, Germany (Africom headquarters) watched live feed from a Predator drone]), aiding an International cause placed higher than American values (aid and comfort) or Americans themselves, or covering for Bill with his Weinstein-like behavior… it sounds like some would have been happier with her comforting lies- FROM THE BOTTOM of a deplorable DECK. Maybe she attended Tony Blair’s Faith Foundation (UN aided) before padding her own (an avowed globalist)! More on the ‘Faith Foundation’ here.



So I ask you,”Do actions speak louder than words?



This reminds me of What Rep. Wilson said the other day (without emotion over La David T. Johnson) because it is self-seeking, like the one above. Just a teaspoon of sugar makes the poison go down (easier) than having to choke someone, right? What chokes you up?






Older Entries